| You are Unregistered, please register to gain Full access. |
|
| |
|
|
|||||||
| Register | Archery Chatroom | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Archery Classified Ads | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| OnTarget! Archery Software Innovative software that immediately improves your scores!! Quickly and easily generate accurate sight tapes. Set all your fixed sight pins with a pin gap template. Create sight mark reference and angle cut charts. Practice "what if" scenarios on images of 3D and Paper targets. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, there I was.........looking for correct spine for Easton Axis FMJ....
corrected my draw length to 30.5 on my Ally have a QAD Ultra HD installed 2" back from forward most berger hole poundage is 67.......so.... poundage 67 draw length 30.5 overdraw 2" arrow length 28.5 point weight 100g (3 blade broadhead and field points) blazer vanes Easton Shaft Selector 2009 tells me 340s OT2 tells me dynamic spine required is .2869...closer to 300s (this is on 2 Cam X-Hard). If I change OT2 to 2 Cam Medium, it matches the Easton program. What the heck man? I am totally confused! Please help. Thanks, |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Answered the same thread on AT...
Your 2008(?) Alligence draw weight 67 draw length 30.5 overdraw 2" arrow length 28.5 2008 Alligence specs Ally w/speed mods 327-335 Ally w/smooth mods 317-325 letoff range 65-80 % As pointed out above by previous posters, the Easton Charts (plural) use "complete arrow length", whereas the OT2 program uses "shaft material length"..defined as the "raw tube length" of the shaft..which does not include point insert, nock bushing, or nock length. When you use the Easton Charts, make sure you are using the correct one when making your selections. There are 2 charts...one for target and one for hunting applications. You didn't state your indended use, so just be aware that the results from each chart will differ slightly. The target chart will recommend "weaker" shafts given the same specs. You'll note that I changed your OD setting from 2" to 0" for the computations. The OD setting provided in OT2 is for compatibility with the Easton charts. I recommend that people set OD to "0", because I haven't seen any studies or had any personal experiences that dictate changing rest position has any significant effect on a shaft's dynamic spine. Assuming the following and your specs from above... 0" over draw 28" shaft material length 100 gr point 12 gr insert 3 x 5gr vanes 12 gr nock Note..when selecting a bow from the database, OT2 converts the DB cam style to those the program uses based on the stated IBO velocity. When there's an IBO range in the DB, the lowest number is used when "apply"ing. Selecting the Ally with Smooth mods and applying from the DB = "1Cam Hard" 317 IBO, 65% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3504 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3419 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.3335 Selecting the Ally with Smooth mods and applying from the DB = "1Cam Hard" 317 IBO. Changing to 80% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3624 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3540 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.3455 Selecting the Ally with Speed mods and applying from the DB = 2Cam X-Hard, 327 IBO, 65% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3054 Optimal "both" spine = 0.2970 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.2885 Selecting the Ally with Speed mods and applying from the DB = 2Cam X-Hard, 327 IBO. Changing to 80% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3143 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3059 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.2975 In between the 1Cam Hard and 2Cam X-Hard designations are 2Cam Hard and 1Cam X-Hard. 2Cam Hard 80% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3443 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3359 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.3274 2Cam Hard 65% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3335 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3250 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.3166 1Cam X-Hard 80% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3291 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3207 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.3123 1Cam X-Hard 65% LO Optimal "target" spine = 0.3193 Optimal "both" spine = 0.3109 Optimal "hunting" spine = 0.3024 All four cam options will give slightly different results for "optimal spine". As you discovered, you can change the cam style to whatever you desire. This is part of OT2's flexibility. It makes a recomendation when you select the bow from the database, then gives you the option to "customize" selections to meet your experience or needs. Mapping spine suggestionsacross the 4 cam styles using the "both" filter and 80% or 65% letoff you get the following... 0.3540 1Cam Hard 80% 0.3419 1Cam Hard 65% 0.3359 2Cam Hard 80% 0.3250 2Cam Hard 65% 0.3207 1Cam X-Hard 80% 0.3109 1Cam X-Hard 65% 0.3059 2Cam X-Hard 80% 0.2970 2Cam X-Hard 65% 0.057 spread
__________________
Larry Clague >>>>>--------> Always OnTarget! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SFA spine vs manufacturer spine charts | tovli | OnTarget! Archery Software | 3 | 03-03-2008 12:48 PM |
| How important is spine? | shootsahoyt | General Archery | 8 | 03-03-2007 03:39 PM |
| ARROW SPINE... | Javelina | General Archery | 7 | 10-01-2006 09:47 AM |